 |
 |
 |
Feature Article The Smart Grid's Ultimate (and Sustaining) Enabler Jul 20, 2009
|
The vocabulary of the Smart Grid is focused on interoperability, but who is assuring operability? That is, where is the market for operability and how will it function? A survey of the Smart Grid landscape reveals that those questions remain conspicuously underconsidered. This might be due to sheer neglect, or perhaps a bold assumption that the market will simply emerge when needed. That approach cannot continue.
For the Smart Grid to meet the various visions attached to it, a vibrant market is needed between supply and demand. This is not currently the case, and has resulted in Smart Grid investment only taking place at a handful of forward-looking utilities (and now by the firehose of federal stimulus spending). But the mutually beneficial exchange between energy supplier and consumer will be the ultimate — and sustaining — enabler.
As in any market, but particularly in one as complex as electricity, the value derived from that exchange will depend in large part on how the interactions of supply (utilities) and demand (household and commercial customers) are defined and carried out. The process of designing an appropriate marketplace will require an exploration of how these elements overlap, and where the exchanges of information, money and energy are best carried out. To aid in that exploration, my colleagues and I have adopted the paradigm Three Pillars of the Smart Grid:
-
Smart Customer: The set of technologies that exists or are under development by which electricity consumers will be able to observe, directly control, or allow local intelligent devices to control their electricity consumption.
-
Smart Utility: The utility that is implementing sophisticated monitoring, digital controls, and locational pricing, as well as reaching out to its customers with programs and plans for “smarter” consumption.
-
Smart Market: The structure of the market that allows for the integration of the technologies, decision logics, and information at the customer and the utility end to create an economically efficient solution in the new dynamic paradigm that the digital technology has created.
|
|
|
Defining the overlap of these elements will determine the character of the Smart Grid.
|
As this diagram vividly displays, information is the critical piece at the heart of all three pillars. For the Smart Grid to work, uniform information will allow the customer to evaluate the relative value of the energy being delivered to any end use. But the question remains, what is that information?
The outcome to that question will form the platform on which the Smart Grid develops. It is the Smart Market that will define and provide the market information — specifically, the price, quantity, and control signals — by which both the Smart Customer and the Smart Utility will find mutually beneficial and economically efficient solutions.
The views expressed in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the opinion of
Charles River Associates or its Energy & Environment Practice.
Richard Tabors is Vice President in the Energy & Environment Practice of Charles River Associates, a global business and economic consulting firm based in Boston, MA. He is a retired Senior Lecturer in Technology & Policy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and co-authored the book Spot Pricing of Electricity.
Email Richard Tabors
Charles River Associates consulting page
| Two Enablers |
| The MS residential service for analyzing home energy use paired with Google carbon offset projects. Aren't Microsoft and Google examples of enablers? Take a plane ride your carbon footprint goes up but you can offset that with saving energy at home. That way you reduce the price of your plane ticket. |
| Mark Szlazak - 07/28/2009 - 22:19 |
| Smart Grid |
| Dick, Years ago when I was in solar energy program at Sandia Labs (Albuquerque) you were at MIT Energy Lab and we did some projects together. Now, 30 year later, you and I are both in the Smart Grid space. Take a look at my Smart Grid blog at www.smartgridman.com |
| Steven E Collier - 07/29/2009 - 08:03 |
| Excellent Smart GRid POV |
| There are so many grand objectives for the Smart Grid that are nowhere near attainable because they require profound institutional and regulatory changes in the industry. Further, they require an entirely unreasonable level of expertise and involvement by the individual consumer. Your three pillars are not yet in place. However, there are things that can be deployed now that are logical extensions of three existing pillars: (1) sensors / controllers (SCADA, AMR, AVL, etc.), (2) two-way digital TCP/IP communications, and (3) decision software (ERP, OMS, GIS) that will move the industry closer to active distribution grid management. This will make it more likely that the industry can be ready to build on the three pillars that you identify. |
| Steven E Collier - 07/29/2009 - 08:12 |
| Two Enablers? Maybe... |
| ...however, if history teaches us anything, it is that Web portals to anything from companies like Google and Microsoft--including SG-related portals--are, first and foremost, vehicles for selling advertising. At the end of the day the money is in the eyeballs. The challenge facing SG will be the same as the ongoing challenge facing IT: ridding themselves of the belief that if we simply deliver 'information' we have done our job. However,at the end of the day, information, like beauty, lies entirely in the eye of the beholder. What consumers need when it comes to SG is knowledge that allows them to recognize information when they experience it. From what I have seen thus far, it is not clear that these kinds of commercial portals will be truly educational in nature. I hope, of course, that I am wrong! |
| Duncan Sutherland - 07/29/2009 - 08:46 |
| smart grid enabler |
| KISS-at least at the interface. The platform provider should make it easy for bi-directional flow of power and information. Power flows to and from the battery through an old fashioned copper wire. Information flow requires a credit card and a small display screen. Power flows in response to two simple questions. How much will I pay or how much will I get paid? |
| Bill Ferree - 07/29/2009 - 09:48 |
| Multiple enablers |
| I think the real uptake will come (and real conservation will begin) when anyone can make money selling electrons they capture but don't use. This awaits policy changes; simple-to-use technologies; cheap solar surfaces and storage; widespread appreciation of the local, national and global benefits of distributed generation and distributed ownership of distributed generation and storage assets; and a much higher average market price that reflects increased demand due to e-vehicles and that reflects transmission costs of remote renewables and externalized costs of fossil fuels. Farsighted utilities are already developing business strategies that use the smart grid to evolve profitably toward their eventual role as managers of the grid and the market and away from their role as sellers. |
| Lance McKee - 07/29/2009 - 19:22 |
| Enablers |
| I view this somewhat differently from Mr. Tabors. There clearly needs to be a market, for without prices that are set by explicit or implicit negotiation between many buyers and many sellers, the kinds of coordination and beneficial interactions envisioned by Smart Grid advocates will not materialize. Most customers will simply not tolerate intrusive, command-and-control measures that adversely affect their businesses and their lifestyles. There need to be Grid Smart consumers that are well informed and highly motivated by social goals, money or... We'll know we have the right kinds of Smart Consumers when they are willing to purchase devices, technologies and services with their own money rather than relying on government or utility subsidies. Grid Smart appliances should be as ubiquitous and as desirable as consumer electronics. If consumers are not willing to spend their own money, then we're doing something (more likely many things) wrong. The Smart Utility piece is perhaps the most difficult, because it will require utilities (and their regulators) to rethink their role and the way they do business. Utilities won't be able to dictate terms in complex, one-sided, onerous retail tariffs. Demand will be somewhat more unpredictable. There will be new intermediaries and new actors. Most importantly, regulators will have to ensure that the "obligation to serve" is recalibrated to put customers rather than regulators at the focus of everything utilities do. |
| Jack Ellis - 07/29/2009 - 21:12 |
| Maybe we are discussing the wrong question? |
| I may be giving too much credit here to companies like Microsoft and Google but if I were sitting in strategic planning in either of these organizations (or many others, for that matter) I would be thinking about a future in which large scale, economical energy (electricity) storage becomes a reality. These companies already know how to manage large server farms to economic advantage. It is a short step (at least conceptually) to managing large energy storage farms. Now, if you can cut a deal with 'local' producers (i.e., homes or industrial customers) and not only help them manage their energy usage but take their excess energy off their hands (for a price), then you have the potential for an entirely new industry of 'energy banks' with the potential to not only sell energy on the open market but to manipulate the supply (and thus price) of energy--like current energy commodities such as oil and gas. As many folks have pointed out, such a future would require fundamental changes with respect to both the regulation of and conceptualization of electricity...but such things have happened before. |
| Duncan Sutherland - 08/05/2009 - 08:58 |
| Enablers |
| I agree with many of the previous posts. The "Enabler" will be faced with a multi-headed monster. There is the daily price variations that can be set into a smart meter monitoring system. A simple Enabler. There are peak demand periods and grid disturbances (loss of a transmission line) that may require contracts to Enable. There is the maximizing of customer onsite generation, a wholesale Enabler. Electric vehicle Enablers will determine that they are a virtual, mobile, mini-utility and will be minimizing their costs by trading like a wholesaler. As Jack pointed out, all these Enablers will cause some concern for the grid operator who is charged with maintaining a stable system and is faced with steep penalties for failure to do so. |
| Michele Wynne - 08/09/2009 - 20:36 |
|
 |





|
San Luis Valley is the Nations Best Model for Renewable
 |
© 2010 SmartGridNews
|
 |
With little fanfare, the San Luis Valley has already become the best model for distributed renewable energy generation in the West and maybe even the Nation.
When the first energy crisis shook ...