|
|
Click to read arguments for and against >> By Liz Enbysk
SGN Managing Editor
So how did it come to this?
From the outside looking in, Boulder's progressive reputation would seem the perfect backdrop for Xcel's grand SmartGridCity experiment. And that may be part of the problem. The Daily Camera, Boulder's newspaper, reports that the fallout between Boulder and Xcel was largely related to the city's goal of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Xcel committed to a 30% renewable energy portfolio by 2020 but apparently that's not soon enough for Boulder.
A rocky union
Not that the relationship has been a perfect match anyway. There have been plenty of signs of discord. Last year we chronicled a SmartGridCity meltdown involving cost overruns and allegations about unfulfilled promises on the part of Xcel. Earlier this year, the Daily Camera reported that Boulder residents were outraged by a mandatory pricing pilot that Xcel heavily promoted.
Still, for a while there was a chance that the upcoming November ballot would include a proposal to renew an agreement with Xcel. The Minneapolis-MN-based utility had suggested it could build the city a wind farm in return for another 20-year franchise. The city council wanted a vote on a franchise agreement that included the wind farm deal; Xcel reportedly wanted the franchise agreement on the ballot sans the wind farm. And that's where talks broke off.
Yet the discord continues in Boulder, where at least two citizens groups have formed. One is RenewablesYes, which is backing "municipalization." Another, called Smart Energy Coalition, says it supports the city's energy goals but is raising concerns about the risks and costs involved in having the city try to run a utility business.
Click to read arguments for and against >>
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|