Regulators, legislators, vendors, utilities, and academia know how a successfully implemented Smart Grid can benefit the
United States.But with so much focus on how the Smart Grid can benefit the electric system, the impact on residential consumers is often overlooked.
Consumer participation has long been a principal characteristic of the Smart Grid as identified by the Modern Grid Strategy team (funded by the Department of Energy and led by the National Energy Technology Laboratory) because active participation of consumers is essential for making the Smart Grid successful.
Yet the “build-it-and-they-will-come” model may not work for those consumers.What should we do to encourage consumers to embrace the transition to a Smart Grid now and ultimately participate with it in the future when it is a reality?
Three steps are needed to gain this support —understanding, alignment, and motivation.
Understanding will only occur if an effective education and communication process is presented to the consumer.The concepts developed by the Modern Grid team were intended to serve as a starting point for this educational process, but clearly more effort is needed.We should place emphasis on howthe Smart Grid can provide benefits to consumers in each of its key value areas such as improved reliability, security, economics, efficiency, environmental friendliness, and safety.
Alignment requires collective consumer understanding of Smart Grid concepts and a general agreementwith those concepts. Agreement requires a collaborative approach and a willingness to allow the consumers to impact the direction of the Smart Grid transition in their respective areas or regions.Unfortunately, Smart Grid planning often begins with defining its technical requirements rather than sharing with consumers why a Smart Grid is needed and what value they can expect to enjoy from its implementation.
Motivation requires a value proposition of adequate size to inspire the consumer to support and participate in the smart grid transition.Communicating a compelling value proposition will motivate consumers and create momentum to move forward.Furthermore, a significant value proposition often encourages groups to seek additional understanding and collaboration so that further alignment is achieved.It is time to provide more visibility on the value proposition from the consumer‘s perspective.
In future installments of this series, I’ll examine the kinds of incentives that exist for consumers and suggest ways we might bring consumer understanding, alignment, and motivation in sync with Smart Grid opportunities.
You are absolutely right "...the “build-it-and-they-will-come” model may not work for those consumers."
But, don´t you think that the real issue is the supply side regulated orientation to the Smart Grid? I have researched, written extensively (Google me please) and discovered that there is huge legacy already made due to an architecting flaw introduced in EPAct 92.
Electricity Without Price Control (EWPC) is a basic organization innovation which has the retail customer as the driver. Under a demand side market orientation, the development of competitive EWPC business model innovations should replace the obsolete monopolistic business model of winning cases to the regulator. The Silicon Valley Model is available to develop an architecture competition, in which the understanding, alignment, and motivation is inherent to the winning propositions.
The Smart Grid has the same decease of the tennis player that has an elbow problem, but since they paid the country club dues (the legacy) they will get hurt even more. However, the problem is that the bill will go to taxpayers and ratepayers.
José Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio, Ph.D. - 09/01/2009 - 18:35
This has to be broad alliance effort
Hi Joe,
I also fully agree with your points that we have to align consumers to agree with -- and actually adopt -- the value prop and tangible offerings/services created by Smart Grid deployments.
As I've seen in many technology sectors, as well as consumer, is that an industry-wide alliance + federal govt (DoE, etc) backing is needed to rapidly and broadly drive that consumer adoption. Messaging, "what's in it for you", etc. will have to be consistent, tested, and universally pushed out by utilities, DoE, and states to achieve the points you note above (even if the actual utility offerings will vary).
Will be keen to see your practical recommendations to implementing that in your future posts/stories.
Mark Weiner
Data Center & Smart Grid Solutions
Cisco
Mark Weiner - 09/02/2009 - 12:39
Two distinct efforts needed
Are manned space flight vehicles and nuclear power stations architecting broad alliance efforts? They are not! They follow the ultraquality architecting imperative.
I see a great application of broad allaince efforts to the commercial systems side of the EWPC basic innovation, but not to the integrated transportation (transmission and distribution) system.
José Antonio Vanderhorst-Silverio, Ph.D. - 09/03/2009 - 15:09
Another step that is needed
Joe, it's a good start, I agree. However, I'd one more step in the process which is Feedback and even more real time than a monthly bill. If the industry educates, gains alignment (a big if outside of California) and motivates through incentives, it will still be important to provide regular, timely feedback. Not necessarily instantaneous, but enough so that they can see where they're making progress and how their changes affected them.
George Fandos - 09/03/2009 - 15:41
Benchmark of Excellence
The Smart Grid Society (part of the Technology Association of Georgia) is setting an exmple of excellence in this area. As a member of the board I am proud to say that we are working har to ensure that we educate ourselves and others about what the smart grid is and that we ensure customer-centricity. The smart grid empowers all in the value chain and true value chain analysis begins with the end user/customer!
Alex Perwich - 09/04/2009 - 07:00
Feedback for the consumer is a must...
In all my research on the subject at hand, I am yet to see where the consumer is even considered. It seems, at least when looking in from the outside, that the benefits to utilities and vendors is great. The gov't financially supports R&D and implementation. The ESP's get to then leverage that investment when rolling out their individually selected model(of which there seems to be little consensus on) . There is no (that I've found) regulation stating that a vendor or ESP (who has been "paid once" by the gov't)HAS to provide the consumer with CALIBRATED data even though they can bill additionally (now they get paid again) for the use of the so called "Smart Meters". If we, as consumers aren't guaranteed accessibility to the data collected, how are we to then make the necessary behavioral changes that will, in time, provide the financial incentive? In many ways, it makes more sense for us to "roll our own" or utilize consumer grade meters that are readily available now. Just one industry outsiders $.02...
Three new demonstration projects caught our attention - a smart grid effort in Albuquerque's business district, a rapid recovery transformer study in Texas and a trial involving low voltage current sensor technologies in the UK. They also got us to thinking: At this stage in the smart grid build out, if you could design a demonstration project, what would it entail? That's our latest Tuesday Topic; click for the details.