The Smart Grid Threat That’s Even Bigger Than Security
By Andy Bochman
Aug 31, 2010 - 10:53:36 AM

---

.

You’d be forgiven for thinking that with the recent excitement over the Stuxnet virus and other cyber threats, that this blogger believes security issues present the biggest challenge to the success of a national Smart Grid.

But there's something else that threatens the grand Smart Grid project on an even more fundamental level: We all have to believe in the goodness of this work enough to see it through ... even when there are setbacks. And sometimes it seems we might not.  

You might also be interested in … . SmartGridCity Meltdown: How Bad Is It? . State regulators question prudence of Boulder's smart grid . BG&E Fallout: What’s the Take-Away for Other Utilities? . Smart Grid Point/Counterpoint: Is It Better to Be a First Mover or a Follower?

.

The corollary of the oft-cited Field of Dreams baseball diamond axiom – “If you build it, they will come” – is the far less-often cited “… and if you don’t, they won’t.”  In 2010 we’re still in the Smart Grid’s infancy, and while it’s not yet clear what’s the right way to build it, this case has shown that failing to plan and permit up front is one guaranteed way to fail. The net net is that the Smart Grid will not be fully deployed in Boulder … not for the foreseeable future anyway.

According to Smart Grid News, Greentech Media and earth2tech’s Katie Fehrenbacher:  The real problem is that [they] … didn’t perform a cost-benefit analysis prior to starting the project. [Also] the group originally didn’t file for a “Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity” … when the project started … a filing that would have enabled the PUC to cap costs of the project to protect rate payers. 

 

Go back to an online debate we held on the Smart Grid Security Blog and the Smart Grid News site almost a year ago. We began with a post I called “First Mover Disadvantage,” turning a standard business school strategy on its head. The basic idea was that in these very early days, there’s far too much uncertainty (e.g., technology, standards, business models, regulatory environment, etc.) for companies, especially electric utilities, to get a jump on the market without enduring substantial setbacks and risk enormous costs for themselves and their rate payers.

Jack’s response, "Not the Lead Dog? Get used to the View," made the case that despite the uncertainty, those utilities with enough chutzpah to get their hands dirty, make mistakes, learn from them and press on, would command a disproportionate share of influence in the market over those sitting on the sidelines waiting for the eventual shake out.

I like both of these ideas, and surely a decent university debate team could make a lot of hay advancing either argument. But I’m going to say that SmartGridCity is an example of moving big and early, and in so doing, doing it wrong from the get-go. Projects this complex, with this many players, will inevitably be quite risky, and therefore must be managed extra carefully. There is less room for short cuts, and even when designed and managed flawlessly, they may still endure their share of lumps. These folks sealed their fate in the beginning, and added insult to injury by boasting so publicly about its achievements.

It’s that last part that bothers me the most, as the biggest threats to the success of the Smart Grid aren’t what you might first imagine: It’s not cyber terrorists, regularity inertia, or flawed technology that most threaten the build-out of the U.S. Smart Grid. Rather, it’s a potential public perception that promised Smart Grid benefits aren’t nearly worth the costs that could kill it before it's born.

In the early days when we're still trying to figure out what works, there are going to be more Bakersfields, BG&E's and now Michigans for sure. But it's important that the industry ensure that success stories make their way to the media at least as often as the gotcha's. I want to focus on the security challenges facing the Smart Grid, but won't be able to do that for long if we don't get the thing fielded in the first place.

 

Andy Bochman and Jack Danahy are authors of the Smart Grid Security Blog.

   

Stay connected with SGN …

Smart Grid Discussions: Get LinkedIn with Jesse

Smart Grid on Facebook

Follow Us on Twitter

Try our RSS feed

Get our email digest

---

---

Smart Grid Newsletter (SGN) is the insider's guide to the Smart Grid revolution. It consists of a FREE bi-monthly email summary, along with a companion Web site that contains the full stories and other helpful materials.

Benefits of subscribing: SGN is the only central source for all of the news, trends, research and marketplace information relevant to grid automation. In it, you will read about cutting edge technologies; successful pioneers and how they got ahead; regulatory changes that could unleash new markets; the latest research; and new opportunities for sales of grid-related products and services.

---

© Copyright 2009 SmartGridNews.com