|
|
Page 2: Lessons from telecommunications >> By Jesse Berst
· Regulatory constraints
· Disintermediation
· Hollowing out
In this article, we'll focus on "hollowing out." Investor-owned utilities could eventually
.
Each of these new players could carve away a small percentage of total revenue. Together, they could chip away enough value to leave the utility a shell, with most of the obligations but little of the profits.
Is third-party demand response a danger?
Demand response is an instructive example. Many utilities have been content to have third-party companies enroll and manage customers. The risks stay with the third-party companies. But so do the revenues – revenues that might otherwise have been divided between utilities and ratepayers.
In some areas, utilities are losing not just "new" revenues, but portions of their core business as well. Demand response and energy efficiency reduce the number of electrons sold, thereby reducing revenue to utilities in traditionally regulated states. Even utilities in decoupled states are at best revenue neutral, without any meaningful incentive for the additional risk and effort.
Page 2: Lessons from telecommunications >>
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|